|
(Washington, NJ, April 27,
2007) Washington, NJ - Herbalist & Alchemist, Inc. supports The
American Herbal Products Association (AHPA) comments submitted today to
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and intends to file similar
comments that reflect AHPA's position calling on the FDA to withdraw its
draft “Guidance for Industry on Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Products and Their Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration.”
AHPA notes the
following in its April 27 press release:
AHPA’s comments state that FDA
should “inform the public that the draft guidance has been withdrawn,”
and that “no further effort should be made by FDA to develop any final
guidance on this subject matter.”
One of the primary reasons that FDA gave for issuing this draft was to
respond to what it describes as ‘increased confusion’ about products
used by practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.
“But the publication of this draft has had exactly the opposite effect,”
commented AHPA president Michael McGuffin, “and both the public and
industry are more rather than less confused. This confusion extends to
the both the content of the document and to FDA’s intentions in
developing it,” he added.
AHPA’s comments also recognize that FDA may decide to go forward with a
final guidance, so provides numerous specific suggestions for
clarification. AHPA suggests, for example, that FDA clearly identify
which “industry” it is attempting to address, and clearly state its
recognition that it “does not have jurisdiction over the practice of
medicine or healing arts, including advice given by health care
practitioners to patients with respect to products dispensed within such
practice.”
AHPA also requests that FDA “refrain from using the term ‘CAM
products’ as a convenient way to refer to products that are used by
practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.” AHPA notes
that its concern with this term “is that it implies that any product
used by a CAM practitioner is a ‘medicine,’ and that FDA’s use of the
term “suggests that FDA is attempting to create both a new legal
definition and agency mandate, superseding acts of Congress, in
contravention of its statutory authority.”
Additional comments will be submitted by May 29
AHPA believes that an error in the Federal Register notice that
announced the availability of FDA’s draft guidance should be interpreted
to allow additional comments to be filed anytime before May 29, 2007.
AHPA intends to submit additional comments near the end of this comment
period, and all AHPA members are invited to forward suggestions to
Michael McGuffin at
mmcguffin@ahpa.org.
Members may also wish to consider submitting their own comments to FDA,
both to express support for AHPA’s filing and to expand on any of the
specific issues addressed in FDA’s draft.
Posting / distribution of AHPA comments encouraged
“AHPA members are encouraged to distribute our comments broadly and to
post them on your websites to try to counter the significant confusion
that this draft guidance has raised,” said McGuffin.
The full text of AHPA’s comments can be found at
http://www.ahpa.org/Portals/0/pdfs/07_0427_AHPAComments_FDA_CAM_Guidance.pdf.
FDA’s draft guidance is at
http://www.ahpa.org/Portals/0/pdfs/06_1200_CAM_Draft_Guidance_FDA.pdf
|